CRS Updates Report on Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)

Industry News

Print

CRS Updates Report on Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)

On July 26, 2021, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) published its updated report, Social Security: The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). The WEP affects Social Security benefits paid to individuals who earn Social Security benefits from Social Security covered employment, but who also earn pension benefits from state or local government employment not covered by Social Security. In these cases, Social Security benefits are lowered by the WEP. 

Social Security benefits are designed to replace a larger percent of pre-retirement income for lower-paid workers than for higher-paid workers. This is done by: 1) calculating an employee’s average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) from employment covered by Social Security; and 2) calculating the employee’s primary insurance amount (PIA) using a formula that applies a higher replacement percentage to lower earnings than to higher earnings. 

In 2021, the PIA formula is:

  • 90% for the first $996 of AIME, plus
  • 32% of AIME over $996 and through $6,002 (if any), plus
  • 15% of AIME over $6,002 (if any). 

Before the WEP was established, for those who split their careers between covered and non-covered Social Security employment, the PIA formula resulted in a higher proportion of covered earnings being subject to the 90% rate. This resulted in what some perceived as a “windfall.” In 1983, Congress passed the WEP to eliminate this perceived advantage by lowering the 90% rate to 40% for those subject to the WEP. 

As of December 2020, the Social Security Administration data indicated that about 1.9 million individuals (or 3% of all Social Security beneficiaries) were affected by the WEP, most of whom (94%) were retired workers. 

Recently, legislation has generally been proposed to either: 1) eliminate the provision for all or some affected beneficiaries; or 2) replace the current law provision with a new proportional formula based on past earnings from both covered and noncovered employment.

The report is available here.

State & Local Workforce Survey Finds Morale Is Up, But Many Have Increased Debt and Ongoing COVID-19 Worries

Industry News

Print

State & Local Workforce Survey Finds Morale Is Up, But Many Have Increased Debt and Ongoing COVID-19 Worries

On July 20, 2021, the MissionSquare Research Institute (formerly the Center for State and Local Government Excellence at ICMA-RC or SLGE) released its survey report, Public Sector Employee Views on Finances and Employment Outlook Due to COVID-19. The national online survey updates the previous polling conducted in May and October 2020 and found that state and local workers had increased financial debt and ongoing COVID-19 worries. 

Among the public sector workforce, positive job morale increased to 56% in May 2021, up from 41% in October 2020. However, about 31% of respondents indicate that working during the pandemic has caused them to consider changing jobs and, of those, 25% would consider leaving the government sector, entirely.

Other key findings include:

  • As of May 2021, 58% of state and local employees are working in person, up from 26% in May 2020;
  • Of those engaged in any in-person work, 74% consider their jobs to be somewhat risky in terms of potential exposure to people who may have COVID-19;
  • 81% are concerned about keeping their family safe from contracting COVID-19;
  • 76% reported that the pandemic has impacted the nature of their job and 31% of those have found it to be very or extremely difficult to adjust to those changes;
  • 43% reported being concerned about saving enough to be financially stable throughout retirement;
  • 41% of respondents and their families reported being negatively impacted financially;
  • 38% have used emergency savings to pay living expenses; and
  • 31% have incurred more debt.

The results are based on a national survey conducted by Greenwald Research in May 2021 of over 1,200 full-time state and local government employees. The final data were weighted by age, gender, income and industry type to reflect the distribution of the state and local government workforce in the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey and the U.S. Census of Governments.

The report is available here.

NIRS Releases Report on Generational Views of Retirement

Industry News

Print

NIRS Releases Report on Generational Views of Retirement

On July 19, 2021, the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) released its report, Generational Views of Retirement in the United States. The NIRS research provides an assessment of Americans’ views about retirement among generational lines.

According to the report, the U.S. is facing a retirement savings crisis and the shortfall may be attributed to many factors including: the shift away from pensions; stagnant wages; lack of employer sponsored plans; cuts to Social Security benefits and increasing costs for health, long-term care and housing in retirement.

The report indicated that those most concerned about the impact of the pandemic on retirement are Millennials and Generation X. It also found that those who are most concerned are planning to delay retirement. Across generations, there is extensive support for Social Security, including increasing contributions and expanding benefits. Notably, all generations have favorable views of defined benefit pensions, with Millennials holding the most favorable views. In addition, there is prevalent agreement generationally that pensions provide greater retirement security than 401(k) plans.

The report concludes that “all generations are worried about retirement, and there is strong support for pensions and Social Security. While there are significant differences in many specific areas, there is generational agreement that national lawmakers need to step up and do more to help Americans prepare for retirement.”

The report is available here.

Groom Law Group Compares Provisions in SECURE 2.0 and Cardin-Portman Legislation

Industry News

Print

Groom Law Group Compares Provisions in SECURE 2.0 and Cardin-Portman Legislation

On July 15, 2021, the Groom Law Group released its publication, Comparison of Provisions in SECURE 2.0 and Cardin-Portman. The publication compares the provisions of two retirement bills being considered in Congress: the Securing a Strong Retirement Act of 2021 (H.R. 2954, referred to as SECURE 2.0) and the Retirement Security & Savings Act (S. 1770, referred to as Cardin-Portman).

SECURE 2.0 was introduced by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) and Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R-TX). On May 5, 2021, the bill was marked up and approved by the Ways and Means Committee. The House Education and Labor Committee is expected to consider the bill before it heads to the House floor for a vote.

The Cardin-Portman bill is the latest legislative effort on retirement issues by Senators Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Rob Portman (R-OH). The Senate Finance and Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committees may mark up the bill later this year.

Groom indicates that the timing for both bills is uncertain, but they could move later in 2021.

The report is available here.

Census Bureau Releases Summary of 2020 Annual Survey of Public Pensions

Industry News

Print

Census Bureau Releases Summary of 2020 Annual Survey of Public Pensions

In July 2021, the U.S. Census Bureau released its summary report, Annual Survey of Public Pensions: 2020. The report summarizes the financial assets, revenues, expenditures and membership for 5,340 state- and locally-administered defined benefit public pension systems. 

Total cash and investment holdings were $4.6 trillion in 2020, up from $4.4 trillion in 2019. Cash and short-term investments increased to $141.6 billion in 2020, up 14.8% from $123.4 billion in 2019. Long-term investments totaled 96.9% of total assets. State- and locally-administered pension systems earned $98.8 million on their investments in 2020. 

According to the report, state- and locally-administered pension systems covered 33.2 million members, up 1.3% from 32.8 million in 2019. The membership was comprised of 14.7 million active members, 11.5 million beneficiaries, and 7.0 inactive members. Benefit payments increased 2.0% to $330.3 million in 2020 from $323.8 million in 2019.  

State and local retirement benefits are funded by employer (and often employee) contributions and investment earnings. In 2020, total contributions amounted to $237.7 million, up 6.1% from $223.9 million in 2019. Employer contributions increased 7.4% to $179.6 million in 2020 and employee contributions increased 2.5% to $58.1 million. 

The summary report is available here.

NASRA Updates Issue Brief on State Hybrid Retirement Plans

Industry News

Print

NASRA Updates Issue Brief on State Hybrid Retirement Plans

In June 2021, the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA) announced the release of its issue brief, State Hybrid Retirement Plans, which updates an earlier version published in July 2020. The brief provides new information on statewide cash balance and combination hybrid plans as well as a map that illustrates the percentage of public employees who participate in mandatory or optional hybrid plans in states that administer such plans for groups of general, public safety or K-12 educational employees.  

While the majority of public employee retirement systems are traditional defined benefit plans, some public-sector plans are considering hybrid plans that contain elements of both defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) plans. The brief examines two types of hybrid plans: 1) cash balance plans that combine elements of a traditional DB plan and individual accounts into a single plan; and 2) “DB+DC” plans that combine a smaller traditional DB pension plan with separate individual DC retirement savings accounts. 

The brief also provides overviews of cash balance and DB+DC plans that have been established in various states, with some dating back several decades. According to the brief, public-sector hybrid plans have diverse combinations of retirement plan designs to address the cost and risk factors of various state or local governments. However, most continue to include features that meet fundamental retirement plan objectives including: mandatory participation, shared financing, professionally managed pooled investments, benefit adequacy and lifetime benefit payouts. Typically, traditional public-sector DB plans that contain hybrid plan elements include benefits or employee contributions that are linked to the plan’s investment performance or actuarial condition.  

The brief is available here.

July 2021

IN THIS ISSUE

• Pension Plans Legislative Update
• Windfall Elimination Provision Update
• California State Court Invalidates San Diego Pension Cuts
• Appeals Court Affirms CalSavers Not Preempted by ERISA
California v. Texas: Supreme Court Rejects the Latest Challenge to the Affordable Care Act
• Tri-Agencies Request Information on CAA Prescription Drug Reporting Requirement
• COBRA Subsidy Guidance Update
• Dependent Care FSA Guidance Update
• Final 2022 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters
• ACA Section 1557 Nondiscrimination